Key Differences
In short — Pentium G840 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G840 is 561 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Performs up to 4% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 49 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G840 - 55 vs 65 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
49
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12761 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |