Buy on Amazon
€60.09
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 520 days newer than Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G840 - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-6300 Black Edition 3.5 GHz Six Core 95W OEM with Thermal Paste Bundle
Buy for €60.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G840
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.