Buy on Amazon
€30.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 2356 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 73% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $27.41 vs $99.89
- Up to 10% better value when playing League of Legends than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.78 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 73 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 228% better in League of Legends than Pentium G6950 - 128 vs 39 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
39
30%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.43
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €30.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
89%
Price, €
€110.88
27%
FPS Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.