Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-870 is 121 days older than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-870 - $27.41 vs $73.12
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-870 - $0.27 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G6950 - 115 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
113
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |