Buy on Amazon
€30.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4380 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $27.41 vs $658.06
- Up to 95% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-12400F - $0.15 vs $2.81 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 30% better in Sea of Thieves than Pentium G6950 - 260 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 12 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
200
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.43
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €30.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 Gaming Desktop (Intel Core™ i5-12400F, 3600Mhz 16GB RGB Memory, NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 3050, 1TB NVMe M.2) S2QT-B66R-350-LCS,White
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 73 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.