Buy on Amazon
€30.78
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1061 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Pentium G6950 - 109 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Pentium G6950 - $27.05 vs $27.73
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €30.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
76.05633802816901%
Multi-Core
517
69.95940460081191%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.