Buy on Amazon
€38.53
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1061 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Pentium G6950 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Pentium G6950 - $27.05 vs $34.71
- Up to 22% better value when playing Deathloop than Pentium G6950 - $0.18 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €38.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16978 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.