Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1020 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 60% cheaper than FX-8320 - $27.73 vs $69.47
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Pentium G6950 - 504 vs 501 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €30.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
70.58823529411765%
Multi-Core
517
28.42221000549753%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |