Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8300 is 1020 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-8300 - $34.71 vs $81.91
- Up to 56% better value when playing Rust than FX-8300 - $0.26 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Pentium G6950 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
149
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13332 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |