Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2797 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 44% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Pentium G645T - 82 vs 57 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 20 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
21.181384248210026%
Multi-Core
606
7.19202468549727%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
