Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 455 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G645T - 372 vs 366 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
72.30142566191446%
Multi-Core
606
73.45454545454545%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |