Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2797 days newer than Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium G645 - 193 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 20 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
168
87.04663212435233%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1558 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
465
27.744630071599047%
Multi-Core
800
9.494422027059104%
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |