Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3776 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $51.18 vs $244.95
- Up to 72% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-13700F - $0.28 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 34% better in Sea of Thieves than Pentium G645 - 274 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 24 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
204
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3237 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
28%
Price, €
€271.89
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €271.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |