Key Differences
In short — Pentium G645 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G645 is 51 days older than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 77% cheaper than FX-8350 - $29.97 vs $133.09
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 8 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €33.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
465
95.28688524590164%
Multi-Core
800
40.100250626566414%
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |