Key Differences
In short — Pentium G640 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G640 is 827 days older than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 24 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
444
45.30612244897959%
Multi-Core
750
11.488970588235293%
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |