Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3208 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $21.94 vs $168.17
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 22% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G640 - 144 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 16 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €24.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77227 minutes ago
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
444
20.451404882542608%
Multi-Core
750
8.177952240758914%
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |