Buy on Amazon
€24.35
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2130 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 56% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $21.94 vs $49.74
- Up to 57% better value when playing Ready or Not than Celeron G4900 - $0.1 vs $0.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Pentium G640 - 240 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for €24.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15986 minutes ago
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15986 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.