Buy on Amazon
€24.35
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G640 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G640 is 235 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 53% cheaper than FX-8150 - $21.94 vs $46.81
- Up to 54% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than FX-8150 - $0.13 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.35
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for €24.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.