Buy on Amazon
€34.29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2726 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 20% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $30.89 vs $38.75
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 22 than Athlon 3000G - $0.14 vs $0.16 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Pentium G640 - 266 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
251
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.29
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for €34.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €43.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Pentium | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.