Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $27.41 vs $303.44
- Up to 84% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900K - $0.13 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 81% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G630 - 412 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 20 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
227
55%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
412
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
15%
Price, €
€336.82
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €336.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |