Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4041 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $27.41 vs $182.78
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600KF - $0.27 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 39% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G630 - 158 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
114
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
21%
Price, €
€202.89
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |