Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 3236 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $27.41 vs $656.05
- Up to 95% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.16 vs $3.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G630 - 209 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
190
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17933 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.48/FPS
4%
Price, €
€728.21
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €728.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17934 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |