Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2553 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $27.41 vs $786.04
- Up to 96% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.08 vs $2.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G630 - 408 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
368
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17955 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
408
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
3%
Price, €
€872.5
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17956 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |