Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6300 is 415 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 71% cheaper than FX-6300 - $27.41 vs $93.62
- Up to 71% better value when playing Deathloop than FX-6300 - $0.18 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Pentium G630 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 6 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
167
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for €103.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |