Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Pentium G4400 - 217 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 36% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $69.68 vs $109.68
- Up to 36% better value when playing Death Stranding than Pentium G4620 - $0.36 vs $0.56 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
64.28571428571428%
Price, €
€121.74
63%
FPS Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39434 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
216
99.53917050691244%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.35
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400 3.3 GHz FCLGA1151
Buy for €77.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
91.6776750330251%
Multi-Core
1184
74.04627892432771%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Pentium | Collection | Pentium |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.