Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $109.68 vs $396.62
- Up to 62% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900 - $1.07 vs $2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 39% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Pentium G4620 - 158 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
114
72.15189873417721%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45101 minutes ago
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.79/FPS
38.35125448028674%
Price, €
€440.25
27%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for €440.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
27.892409727339718%
Multi-Core
1599
9.734567149640814%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.