Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $109.68 vs $204.72
- Up to 10% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-11900K - $0.85 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 69% better in War Thunder than Pentium G4620 - 243 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
144
59.25925925925925%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40461 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
90.42553191489363%
Price, €
€227.24
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €227.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
31.927456769295652%
Multi-Core
1599
14.605407380343442%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |