Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $109.68 vs $153.55
- Up to 9% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-11900F - $1.28 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G4620 - 121 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
95
78%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16921 minutes ago
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
90%
Price, €
€170.44
71%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.