Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $439
Availability
MSRP in USD: $439
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $109.68 vs $190.07
- Up to 41% better value when playing Control than Core i9-11900 - $0.61 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Pentium G4620 - 205 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
97.5609756097561%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40410 minutes ago
Core i9-11900
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
59.22330097087378%
Price, €
€210.98
57%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €210.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-11900
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
35.539906103286384%
Multi-Core
1599
18.137477313974593%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.