Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $109.68 vs $182.06
- Up to 30% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900KF - $0.77 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G4620 - 183 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
86.33879781420765%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39468 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
70%
Price, €
€202.09
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
42.93817356778219%
Multi-Core
1599
17.467773650863013%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |