Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $109.68 vs $304.01
- Up to 60% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-10900 - $0.6 vs $1.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 12% better in Borderlands 3 than Pentium G4620 - 227 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 20 vs 4 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
202
88.98678414096916%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41173 minutes ago
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
40.26845637583892%
Price, €
€337.45
36%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €337.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
44.424882629107984%
Multi-Core
1599
18.988243676522977%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.