Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1301 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $109.68 vs $197.42
- Up to 37% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10850K - $0.17 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 15% better in Valorant than Pentium G4620 - 814 vs 710 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 20 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
710
87.22358722358723%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41235 minutes ago
Core i9-10850K
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
814
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
62.96296296296296%
Price, €
€219.14
55%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10850K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-10850K
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
43.50574712643678%
Multi-Core
1599
17.57915567282322%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.