Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 840 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $109.68 vs $160.86
- Up to 24% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-9700 - $1.18 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Pentium G4620 - 115 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
103
89.56521739130436%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38506 minutes ago
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
76.12903225806451%
Price, €
€178.56
68%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-9700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.7 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €178.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
48.65038560411311%
Multi-Core
1599
25.719800546887566%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.