Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 2772 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than Core i7-950 - 144 vs 131 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 44% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $60.91 vs $109.68
- Up to 39% better value when playing War Thunder than Pentium G4620 - $0.52 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
61.1764705882353%
Price, €
€121.74
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45110 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FPS
131
90.97222222222221%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |