Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 454 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $109.68 vs $145.5
- Up to 4% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-8700T - $1.58 vs $1.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Pentium G4620 - 98 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Pentium G4620 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
77
78.57142857142857%
Value, €/FPS
€1.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43599 minutes ago
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
95.75757575757576%
Price, €
€161.51
75%
FPS Winner
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43600 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
57.261724659606664%
Multi-Core
1599
34.08654871029631%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.