Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $109.68 vs $231.95
- Up to 40% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-14700F - $1.0 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 26% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G4620 - 154 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 28 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
122
79.22077922077922%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41216 minutes ago
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
59.88023952095809%
Price, €
€257.46
47%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-14700F Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz
Buy for €257.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
27.27927927927928%
Multi-Core
1599
9.225709669974613%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 20 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 51 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.