Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $212
Availability
MSRP in USD: $212
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - $109.68 vs $128.65
- Up to 5% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-12500 - $0.71 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-12500 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than Pentium G4620 - 191 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
89.52879581151832%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38422 minutes ago
Core i5-12500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
94.66666666666667%
Price, €
€142.8
85%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5 (12th Gen) i5-12500 3 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for €142.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-12500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
32.75638251839031%
Multi-Core
1599
17.61207181407644%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.