Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Pentium G4620 - 283 vs 260 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $92.86 vs $109.68
- Up to 23% better value when playing F1 22 than Pentium G4620 - $0.36 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
260
91.87279151943463%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
76.59574468085107%
Price, €
€121.74
84%
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38400 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
283
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €103.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
39.02061855670103%
Multi-Core
1599
21.904109589041095%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |