Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Pentium G4620 - 182 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $84.81 vs $109.68
- Up to 27% better value when playing Deathloop than Pentium G4620 - $0.52 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
93.95604395604396%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
73.23943661971832%
Price, €
€121.74
77%
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39436 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39439 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
44.89916963226572%
Multi-Core
1599
23.449186097668278%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |