Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Pentium G4620 - 174 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $90.66 vs $109.68
- Up to 21% better value when playing God of War than Pentium G4620 - $0.58 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
166
95.40229885057471%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
79.45205479452055%
Price, €
€121.74
82%
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39413 minutes ago
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110400
Buy for €100.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39416 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
52.93706293706294%
Multi-Core
1599
29.13098925122973%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.