Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 1220 days older than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Pentium G4620 - 201 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $29.98 vs $109.68
- Up to 72% better value when playing Control than Pentium G4620 - $0.17 vs $0.61 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
99.50248756218906%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
27.868852459016395%
Price, €
€121.74
27%
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45177 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
76.08040201005025%
Multi-Core
1599
81.58163265306122%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |