Buy on Amazon
€121.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G4900 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $39.15 vs $109.68
- Up to 64% better value when playing Control than Pentium G4620 - $0.22 vs $0.61 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
36.0655737704918%
Price, €
€121.74
35%
FPS Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45176 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
99.5%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
81.37384412153237%
Multi-Core
1051
65.7285803627267%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.