Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610 - 114 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 75% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $27.05 vs $109.68
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Pentium G4620 - $0.27 vs $1.07 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |