Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 915 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G4620 - 200 vs 195 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $91.24 vs $109.68
- Up to 18% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G4620 - $0.51 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
195
97.5%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
82.25806451612904%
Price, €
€121.74
83%
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38478 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38480 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
67.10992907801419%
Multi-Core
1599
44.18347609836972%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |