Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4620 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4620 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 29% better in Diablo IV than FX-8350 - 125 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-8350 - $109.68 vs $135.27
- Up to 37% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-8350 - $0.97 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14140 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |