Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than FX-8150 - 710 vs 682 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 45% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $59.97 vs $109.68
- Up to 41% better value when playing Valorant than Pentium G4620 - $0.1 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
710
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
58.82352941176471%
Price, €
€121.74
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41236 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
682
96.05633802816902%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |