Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than FX-6350 - 146 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 33% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $73.11 vs $109.68
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dead Space than Pentium G4620 - $0.56 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
67.46987951807229%
Price, €
€121.74
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45293 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
145
99.31506849315068%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |