Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4560 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1492 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 4% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610 - 127 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $20.87 vs $27.05
- Up to 28% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610 - $0.18 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€23.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €23.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2681 minutes ago
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2681 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4560 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |