Buy on Amazon
€18.41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 471 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $16.59 vs $128.69
- Up to 87% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.09 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 2% better in The Outer Worlds than Pentium G4560 - 201 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
197
98.00995024875621%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.41
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4560 - 3.5 GHz - 2 cores - 4 threads - 3 MB cache - LGA1151 Socket - Box
Buy for €18.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
12.676056338028168%
Price, €
€142.85
12%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for €142.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
707
63.46499102333932%
Multi-Core
1452
26.452905811623246%
Intel Pentium G4560 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.