Buy on Amazon
€21.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $19.74 vs $160.13
- Up to 86% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i7-10700F - $0.15 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Saints Row than Pentium G4400 - 165 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.91
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz Dual-Core 2-Thread CPU Processor 3M 54W LGA 1151
Buy for €21.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
13%
Price, €
€177.74
12%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.