Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Core i5-2500 - 141 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 69% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $21.58 vs $69.68
- Up to 67% better value when playing War Thunder than Pentium G4400 - $0.18 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
32.72727272727272%
Price, €
€77.35
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3824 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
136
96.45390070921985%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€23.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €23.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |